The Impact of RSI on Scaffolding Self-Regulated Learning
| Self-Regulated Learning Challenge | Historically Marginalized Students Most Affected | How RSI Responds | Equity Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Difficulty with time management in self-paced environments | Students from under-resourced K–12 systems who had fewer opportunities to develop planning strategies | Regular Interaction: weekly announcements, pacing reminders, structured module guidance | Provides external structure that helps students develop planning and time-management habits |
| Delayed task initiation or procrastination | Students adjusting to online learning expectations | Regular Interaction: reminders, check-ins, and progress monitoring | Encourages early engagement with assignments and helps students stay on track |
| Limited experience monitoring learning progress | Students with less exposure to metacognitive learning strategies | Substantive Interaction: progress feedback and instructor guidance on improvement | Helps students recognize gaps in understanding and adjust learning strategies |
| Difficulty interpreting feedback | Students developing academic language or disciplinary thinking | Substantive Interaction: scaffolded feedback explaining how to improve | Supports students in translating feedback into actionable revision strategies |
| Lack of experience with revision and iterative learning | Students from educational contexts emphasizing one-time evaluation | Substantive Interaction: revision opportunities and guided improvement | Encourages growth-oriented learning and skill development |
| Limited accountability structures in online courses | Students balancing work, caregiving, or other responsibilities | Regular + Substantive Interaction: instructor check-ins, milestone assignments, and progress reminders | Maintains engagement and supports sustained participation |
| Limited familiarity with academic learning strategies | Students who have not been explicitly taught study or planning strategies | Substantive Interaction: modeling of problem-solving, analysis, and disciplinary thinking | Makes effective learning strategies visible and teachable |
Examples of How Faculty Can Scaffold Self-Regulated Learning Through RSI
| Self-Regulated Learning Challenge | RSI Category | What Faculty Can Do | Example in an Online Course |
|---|---|---|---|
| Students struggle with time management in asynchronous courses | Regular Interaction – Category A (Course Structure & Presence) | Provide predictable pacing guidance and course organization | Weekly announcements outlining priorities, deadlines, and recommended pacing |
| Students delay starting major assignments | Regular Interaction – Category A (Course Structure & Presence) | Break major assignments into staged checkpoints | Require proposal, outline, draft, and final submission milestones |
| Students unsure how to plan their work | Regular Interaction – Category A (Course Structure & Presence) | Provide planning tools and weekly guidance | Include module checklists that outline required tasks and recommended study steps |
| Students fall behind without noticing | Regular Interaction – Category B (Engagement Monitoring & Support) | Monitor engagement and send progress reminders | Contact students who have not submitted assignments or logged in recently |
| Students unsure how to interpret feedback | Substantive Interaction – Category B (Individualized Feedback) | Provide feedback explaining how to improve and what strategies to try | Comment on assignments with suggestions for revising arguments or strengthening evidence |
| Students unfamiliar with effective learning strategies | Substantive Interaction – Category A (Live Instruction) | Demonstrate how to approach complex tasks | Host a live session explaining how to analyze readings or approach a research assignment |
| Students unsure how to revise work | Substantive Interaction – Category B (Individualized Feedback) | Provide revision opportunities and guidance | Allow draft submissions with feedback explaining how to strengthen the final version |
| Students misunderstand course concepts | Substantive Interaction – Category C (Course-Level Instructional Response) | Address patterns of misunderstanding across the class | Post a mini-lesson clarifying concepts that many students struggled with on a quiz |
| Students struggle to apply feedback to new tasks | Substantive Interaction – Category D (Embedded Activity Facilitation) | Guide thinking within discussions or activities | Ask follow-up questions in discussion threads that prompt deeper analysis and reflection |
